When a product is sold to consumers, the manufacturer or seller has a responsibility to ensure that the product is safe. That includes the way the product is designed, manufactured, and sold. Products are legally required to meet the ordinary expectations of the consumer. When a product has a defect that jeopardizes the consumer’s safety, it does not meet the consumer’s ordinary expectations. If a consumer is injured by a defective product, he or she may wish to file a products liability lawsuit against the liable party. A skilled attorney will review the details of the case, determine who is liable for the injuries, and fight for all entitled compensation that the consumer deserves.
Although there are a wide range of defective products cases, they generally fall into the following main categories:
In order to pursue a products liability claim, the injured person must be able to prove that the defect caused the injury. For example, if a motorist was speeding and was injured in an accident after being unable to slow down when he approached a curve in the road, he must be able to prove that the missing brake pads caused the accident, and not the fact that he was speeding.
As with defectively manufactured products, a person who is injured must be able to prove that the injury was caused by the defective design. For example, if an individual is electrocuted while using an electric shaver near water, he or she must be able to prove that the injury was caused by the defective product, and not by an electric device being used incorrectly.
Again, an injury must be directly caused by a failure to warn, not simply by the product alone. For example, if a consumer suffers a burn injury from the electric tea kettle discussed above, that is not enough to file a products liability claim. He or she must prove that the burn was caused by the poorly positioned steam valve.
Prescription drugs are often the subject of product liability lawsuits. Drug companies have a responsibility to follow all testing criteria required by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). However, even if a drug is licensed by the FDA, it does not affect the manufacturer’s liability if a consumer is injured by a drug that proves to be defective. When it comes to determining liability for a drug-related injury, the doctor who prescribes a drug, a nurse who administers a drug, or a pharmacist who fills a prescription can all be considered at-fault. A skilled legal professional can determine who is liable and secure financial compensation for the resulting injuries.
For a consumer to have a successful products liability claim, he or she must prove the following:
If the claim meets these requirements, the consumer can proceed with a products liability lawsuit, which must be filed within two years from the time the injury is or should have been discovered. Missing this deadline could jeopardize the consumer’s right to recovery or result in the claim being denied.
For products liability to arise, the defective product had to be sold in the marketplace, and that product caused the consumer to become injured. There are several parties that make up a product’s chain of distribution. Depending on the nature of the defect, liability may rest with any of the following parties:
If a consumer is injured by a defective product, the seller, manufacturer, or other party who sold the defective product may use the following defense strategies to protect their interests and avoid being held liable for the consumer’s injuries:
California uses the comparative negligence rule, which means that an injured consumer can collect damages even if he or she is 99 percent at-fault. However, the amount of damages that he or she will collect is limited by his or her degree of fault. For example, if a consumer purchased a product that exploded, resulting in $10,000 in damage to the consumer’s home, the consumer could recover $8,000 from the seller or manufacturer of the product even if he or she was 20 percent at-fault. The economic loss rule states that individuals cannot recover damages for pure economic losses, including lost profits.
In California, the economic loss rule generally prohibits individuals from recovering damages for purely economic losses, including lost profits. In this context, a purely “economic loss” occurs where the plaintiff has suffered no appreciable personal injuries or property damage, such as improper construction work that has not caused any out-of-pocket damage to the structure. Despite this rule, a pure economic loss can be recovered in a limited number of circumstances. For example, if the parties are in a special relationship where the plaintiff was an intended beneficiary of a particular transaction, but was harmed by the defendant’s negligence in carrying it out, the economic loss rule will not apply. The circumstances of the case will determine whether the parties are in a special relationship that the law will recognize.
If you or a loved one was injured by a defective product, you are urged to contact the LA catastrophic injury lawyers at ACTS LAW at your earliest convenience. We will thoroughly review your case and determine who is responsible for the defective product that caused your injuries. Our skilled legal team will work tirelessly to protect your rights. To schedule a free consultation, call us today at 833-228-7529 or contact us online. From our offices in San Diego and Los Angeles, we serve clients throughout Southern California.
When defective and dangerous consumer products cause injuries or even death, it is crucial to hold the responsible parties accountable. Despite consumer protection laws and advanced manufacturing tech...
Effective Sept. 1, 2021, Amazon will compensate customers who suffered injuries or property damage from a defective product they bought on Amazon, including those that were purchased through a third-p...
A woman using a NutriBullet 900 suffered lacerations and severe burns when the blender’s parts separated while in use, causing them to explode out of its cup. Surgery was required to treat her injuri...